AI Investment & GDP: The Hidden Engine of Growth? (With an India Lens)

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has shifted from promise to production. Trillions in projected investment are cascading into compute, data centers, models, and productivity tools—raising the question every macroeconomist cares about: how much does AI actually move the GDP needle? This article takes a measured, evidence-led view, with a special focus on India’s opportunity set and constraints.


1) What We Know So Far: AI Capex and Measured Growth

In advanced economies like the U.S., AI-related capital expenditure has surged to between 1.2% and 2% of GDP in 2025, driven by investments exceeding $350 billion from leading firms like Microsoft, Amazon, Meta, and Alphabet.

This CapEx boost translates into real, measurable economic impact:

  • A conservative estimate suggests AI CapEx adds up to 0.7 percentage points of annual GDP growth.
  • Some economists estimate AI-related CapEx contributed to over one-third of U.S. GDP growth in Q2 2025, a portion of a 2.5% annualized growth rate.

Globally, AI infrastructure investment is rising rapidly: projections indicate a 44% year-over-year increase in global AI CapEx, reaching $414 billion in 2025.

While these figures—especially those comparing AI to historical infrastructure—may evoke spectacle, the translation from CapEx to lasting productivity gains remains uncertain. Diffusion delays, organizational readiness, and sectoral variation temper expectations. Research on Total Factor Productivity (TFP) broadly supports a positive but moderate mid-term boost, though exact magnitudes remain debated.


2) The Transmission Channels: How AI Raises Output

  • Capital deepening: Massive investments in GPUs, data centers, and connectivity increase the effective capital stock per worker.
  • TFP gains from task re-design: Generative AI and decision-support tools reduce time on routine cognitive tasks and improve error rates.
  • Product innovation: New products, features, and services expand consumer surplus and can raise measured output where priced.
  • Spillovers: Open-source models, tooling, and ecosystem effects lower costs for downstream adopters, amplifying aggregate gains.

The macro punch depends on adoption breadth (how many firms and sectors adopt), complements (skills, data quality, governance), and policy (privacy, competition, trade).


3.1 India Perspective: Potential GDP Uplift

India’s projections range widely but remain consistently material. According to multiple studies:

  • NASSCOM/TeamLease projects AI could contribute $450–500 billion to India’s GDP by 2025, representing about 10% of the $5 trillion GDP target.
  • EY India forecasts Generative AI alone could add $359–438 billion by FY2029–30, equating to a 5.9–7.2% uplift over baseline GDP.
  • Acuité Ratings estimates strategic AI adoption could add $500 billion to GDP by 2035, increasing annual GDP growth by 1.3 percentage points.
  • ITIF suggests AI could deliver $1.2–1.5 trillion by 2030 and create around 2.3 million new jobs if scaled with reforms and infrastructure investments.

The core mechanisms behind these gains include productivity enhancement in IT/ITeS, digitization-led efficiency in public services, formalization of MSMEs via AI tooling, and sectoral leapfrogging in health, agriculture, and finance.

3.2 What Gives India an Edge

  • Human capital at scale: India’s IT sector employs over 5.6 million people and generates $283 billion in annual revenue, with growing GenAI capabilities, elite research institutions, and a vibrant startup scene.
  • Digital public infrastructure: Platforms like India Stack (Aadhaar, UPI, account aggregators) handle billions of transactions monthly and provide the rails for data-rich AI applications with an inclusion-first focus.
  • Mission-led investment: The IndiaAI Mission, launched in 2024, allocates $1.2 billion toward compute capacity, datasets, and AI skilling programs, aiming to shorten adoption lags across sectors.

3.3 Frictions & Risks to Manage

  • Diffusion gap: Benefits may concentrate in large enterprises unless MSMEs—which form over 30% of India’s GDP—gain access to affordable AI tools, compute credits, and implementation support.
  • Labor transition: Task automation in services could impact segments of the IT workforce; reskilling programs and role-mobility pathways are essential to preserve aggregate incomes.
  • Compute and energy constraints: Dependence on imported high-end chips and current grid limitations could slow model training and inference at scale.
  • Governance & data quality: Strong data protection, competition policy, and high-quality public-good datasets are critical complements for safe and high-impact adoption.

4) Calibrate Expectations, Accelerate Complements

Short-run GDP contributions from AI capex can look striking, but sustained growth depends on productivity diffusion. For India, the macro story is compelling if three levers move together: (1) Compute & connectivity (domestic capacity, efficient access), (2) Skills & organizational change (managerial capability, domain-specific tooling), and (3) Institutions (data governance, competitive markets, and public-good datasets).

A reasonable base case is a meaningful but graduated rise in measured productivity through the late 2020s, with upside if MSME adoption scales and sectoral pilots in health/agri/finance are translated into nationwide programs. Policymakers should judge success not by model count, but by diffusion metrics: firm-level AI use, time-to-implementation, skills penetration, and export share in AI-enabled services.


5) Actionable Implications for Indian Stakeholders

  • Enterprises: Prioritize high-ROI use cases (customer support, code assist, procurement, risk) with clear KPIs; build internal “AI ops” capability.
  • MSMEs: Adopt lightweight, domain-tuned tools via SaaS; leverage government/industry programs for subsidized onboarding and skilling.
  • Government: Expand neutral compute access; publish high-quality public-good datasets; align data protection, competition, and standards.
  • Workforce: Invest in complementary human capital—prompting, data literacy, domain-tuned analytics, and process redesign.
  • Investors: Look for firms with credible adoption roadmaps, unit-economics discipline, and moat-building through data/process integration.

Quick Glossary

AI Capital Expenditure (AI Capex)

Spending on AI infrastructure (GPUs, data centers), software, and implementation needed to build and deploy AI systems.

Total Factor Productivity (TFP)

A measure of efficiency capturing output gains not explained by additional labor or capital—often where technology’s impact shows up.



References


Disclaimer

  • This article is for informational purposes only and provides general economic commentary. It is not investment advice.
  • Macroeconomic estimates are subject to model uncertainty and revision as new data becomes available.
  • Past performance and historical relationships do not guarantee future outcomes.
  • Investors should evaluate their objectives, risk tolerance, and consult a qualified financial advisor before making decisions.
  • Wealth North does not guarantee returns or assume responsibility for investment outcomes.
Back to blog