Compare Investment Structures

PMS vs AIF: Which Suits Your Portfolio?

Portfolio Management Services and Alternative Investment Funds are two SEBI-regulated routes for sophisticated investors in India. They differ in minimum investment, structure, liquidity, taxation, and the strategies they can access.

Explore PMS Providers Explore AIF Providers
PMS

Portfolio Management Service

Minimum ₹50 Lakhs

  • Securities held in your demat
  • No SEBI-mandated lock-in
  • Daily portfolio visibility
  • Mostly listed equities

Fits investors deploying ₹50L–₹3Cr who want concentrated equity exposure with direct ownership.

AIF

Alternative Investment Fund

Minimum ₹1 Crore

  • Pooled fund, you hold units
  • 3–10 year tenure typical
  • Quarterly NAV reporting
  • Listed + unlisted + derivatives

Fits HNIs and family offices comfortable with longer lock-ins for access to strategies beyond listed equity.

Side-by-side

How PMS and AIF differ

A detailed comparison across the dimensions that drive the choice between these two structures.

Attribute
PMS
AIF
Minimum Investment Per SEBI regulations
₹50 Lakhs per portfolio manager
₹1 Crore per investor per fund
Structure How your money is held
Individual portfolio managed separately; securities sit in the investor's own demat account
Pooled fund; investors hold units of the fund vehicle
Asset Ownership
Direct beneficial ownership of each security
Unit holder of the fund; no direct title to underlying assets
Liquidity Exit flexibility
No SEBI-mandated lock-in; exits typically possible subject to provider terms
Close-ended AIFs lock capital for 3–10 years; open-ended Category III may allow periodic redemptions
Taxation General treatment
Taxed at investor level; capital gains apply on each profitable trade as per asset type and holding period
Category I & II: pass-through to investors. Category III: taxed at fund level at applicable rates including surcharge
Fee Structure
Fixed management fee (typically 1–2.5%) plus performance fee (10–20% above hurdle)
Management fee (1–2%), performance fee/carry (often 20%) above a hurdle rate, plus setup and operating expenses
Investment Universe
Primarily listed equity, some debt; standard PMS cannot use leverage or invest in unlisted securities
Listed equity, unlisted equity, debt, derivatives, real estate, infrastructure, hedge strategies — varies by category
Transparency Visibility of holdings
Daily holdings, transactions, and valuation visible in investor's demat account
Periodic factsheets and NAV updates; underlying holdings disclosed per fund cadence
Tenure
Open-ended; no defined fund tenure
Category I & II are close-ended with minimum 3-year tenure; Category III may be either
Customisation
Possible — discretionary, non-discretionary, or advisory mandates available
Standardised per fund mandate; same strategy applied to all investors in the fund
Capital Deployment
Full investment made at onboarding
Close-ended funds call capital in tranches via drawdown notices over the investment period
Suited For
HNIs with ₹50L–₹3Cr equity allocation seeking concentrated portfolios with daily transparency
UHNIs and family offices with ₹1Cr+ commitments comfortable with longer lock-ins and complex strategies

Choose PMS if

  • Equity allocation is between ₹50L and ₹3Cr
  • Daily transparency of holdings and trades matters to you
  • Liquidity flexibility is important — no defined lock-in needed
  • You want exposure primarily to listed Indian equities

Choose AIF if

  • Commitment of ₹1Cr or more is comfortable
  • Investment horizon is 5+ years with capital lock-in
  • You want access to unlisted equity, derivatives, or hedged strategies
  • Pooled structure with standardised mandate suits your style

Consider both if

  • Portfolio size is large enough to allocate across both (typically ₹5Cr+)
  • You want to combine listed equity transparency (PMS) with private/hedged exposure (AIF)
  • Diversifying across investment structures aligns with your risk approach

Common Misconceptions

Myth vs Reality

Myth

AIFs always deliver higher returns than PMS.

Reality

Returns depend on the strategy, market cycle, and manager skill. Many PMS strategies have matched or outperformed comparable AIFs over similar periods. The structural difference doesn't dictate return outcomes.

Myth

PMS is riskier because portfolios are more concentrated.

Reality

Concentration risk exists in both. Many Category III AIFs run portfolios of 20–30 stocks, similar to focused PMS strategies. Risk depends on the specific strategy, not the structure.

Myth

AIF taxation is more efficient than PMS.

Reality

Only Category I and II AIFs offer pass-through status for most income. Category III AIFs are taxed at the fund level, which can be less efficient than PMS for high-income investors holding listed equity. The right answer depends on the fund category and the investor's tax bracket.

Myth

PMS is just an expensive mutual fund.

Reality

PMS provides direct security ownership in your demat, allows greater customisation, and typically runs more concentrated portfolios. Mutual funds pool capital with daily NAV and stricter diversification rules. They serve different needs at different investment thresholds.

Myth

All AIFs are illiquid hedge funds.

Reality

AIFs span three categories. Category I funds support start-ups and infrastructure. Category II includes private equity and real estate funds. Category III includes long-only equity, long-short, and hedge strategies. Liquidity, lock-in, and risk vary significantly across categories.

Still deciding?

Talk to Wealth North for a structure that fits your portfolio.

Get a personalised review of PMS and AIF options based on your investable corpus, liquidity needs, and goals.